Skip to main content

Structural Decisions

 █████╗ ██████╗  ██████╗██╗  ██╗██╗████████╗███████╗ ██████╗████████╗██╗   ██╗██████╗ ███████╗
██╔══██╗██╔══██╗██╔════╝██║  ██║██║╚══██╔══╝██╔════╝██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝██║   ██║██╔══██╗██╔════╝
███████║██████╔╝██║     ███████║██║   ██║   █████╗  ██║        ██║   ██║   ██║██████╔╝█████╗  
██╔══██║██╔══██╗██║     ██╔══██║██║   ██║   ██╔══╝  ██║        ██║   ██║   ██║██╔══██╗██╔══╝  
██║  ██║██║  ██║╚██████╗██║  ██║██║   ██║   ███████╗╚██████╗   ██║   ╚██████╔╝██║  ██║███████╗
╚═╝  ╚═╝╚═╝  ╚═╝ ╚═════╝╚═╝  ╚═╝╚═╝   ╚═╝   ╚══════╝ ╚═════╝   ╚═╝    ╚═════╝ ╚═╝  ╚═╝╚══════╝

  designing systems under uncertainty • balancing trade-offs • containing failure

Context​

This section represents a personal knowledge base built over years of designing, evolving, and operating software systems.

Not everything encountered along the way is documented here. Only the parts that proved to be durable, recurring, or costly enough to justify reflection.

Architecture, in this context, is not treated as a theoretical discipline, but as a byproduct of real constraints: delivery pressure, scale, failure, organizational boundaries, and time.

What Is Collected Here​

The material under this section focuses on architectural decisions that tend to persist, regardless of technology stack or momentary trends.

These include, but are not limited to:

  • how systems are structured and where boundaries are drawn
  • how responsibilities are assigned and enforced
  • how data, communication, and failure propagate through a system
  • how trade-offs are evaluated when there is no clearly correct choice

The intent is not to catalogue patterns, but to document the reasoning behind structural choices and the consequences they tend to produce over time.

Assumptions and Perspective​

The perspective taken throughout this section assumes that:

  • most systems are distributed in practice, even when not designed to be
  • partial failure is the norm, not an edge case
  • scalability is constrained as much by teams and processes as by infrastructure

If a problem can be addressed without considering time, failure modes, or organizational structure, it is unlikely to be architectural in nature.

Architecture as an Accumulation of Decisions​

Very few systems are architected in a single moment.

What usually exists instead is an accumulation of decisions: some explicit, many implicit, most made under imperfect information.

Over time, these decisions solidify into structure. At that point, architecture becomes less about design and more about understanding what has already been locked in.

This section documents that reality, rather than idealized greenfield scenarios.

How to Use This Material​

These documents are not meant to be consumed sequentially or treated as reference manuals.

They are intended to be:

  • revisited as systems evolve
  • questioned when context changes
  • compared against lived experience

Disagreement is expected. In many cases, it is a sign that the material is doing its job.

The value of this knowledge compounds not through agreement, but through reflection.